A local study completed in Singapore, which was part of an international multi-country study that aims to develop a global assessment of exposure to second-hand smoke in indoor workplaces, gathered data regarding the indoor air quality of public areas. It was hypothesised that air would be less polluted in non-smoking venues compared to places where smoking occurred.  

A TSI SidePak AM510 Personal Aerosol Monitor was used to sample and record the levels of respirable suspended particles (RSP) in the air. A broad range of venues were sampled in Singapore. The primary goal of data analysis was to assess the difference in the average levels of RSP in smoke-free and non smoke-free venues. Data was assessed at 3 levels: (a) the mean RSP across all venues sampled compared with the mean levels of smoke-free and non smoke-free venues, (b) levels in venues where smoking occurred compared with similar venues in Ireland, and (c) comparison between smoke-free and non smoke-free areas according to the type of venue. Statistical significance was assessed using the Mann-Whitney U-test.

The level of indoor air pollution was 96% lower in smoke-free venues compared to non smoke-free venues. Averaged across each type of venue, the lowest levels of indoor air pollution were found in restaurants (17 microg/m3) and the highest in bars (622 microg/m3); both well above the US EPA Air Quality Index hazardous level of >or=251 ug/m3.  

This study demonstrates that workers and patrons are exposed to harmful levels of a known carcinogen and toxin. Policies that prohibit smoking in public areas dramatically reduce exposure and improve worker and patron health. 

Reference: Koong HN, Khoo D, Higbee C, Travers M, Hyland A, Cummings KM, Dresler C., Global air monitoring study: a multi-country comparison of levels of indoor air pollution in different workplaces, Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore. Ann Acad. Med Singapore. 2009 Mar;38(3):202-6. 

Free Fulltext: Global Air Monitoring Study: A Multi-country Comparison of Levels of Indoor Air Pollution in Different Workplaces

This entry was posted on Saturday, June 13th, 2009 and is filed under Diagnosis Chemical Injury, Indoor Air Pollution, Prevention. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response or Trackback from your own site.